One of the most challenging exhibitions that I've recently seen in London was mounted at Raven Row over the summer, an
independent foundation based in one of London’s oldest, surviving shops in
Spitalfields. The starting point for the show can be summed up by the phrase
coined by Miles Davis to ‘play what’s not there’. This impossible act became a
metaphor for a larger enquiry around existential expression in art. Curator,
Michael Bracewell, chose to explore artists working beyond Soren Kierkegaard’s
description of ‘the despair of the aesthetic’, those infinite and potentially paralysing creative decisions, in order to achieve something
more profound and ‘spiritual’. It is a highly romantic notion of artists
as visionary and medium, compelled to reach for ‘truth’ despite the cost and then
to share knowledge with those who choose a safer, more prosaic route.
In a succinct essay, Bracewell examines Kierkegaard’s
philosophical quest for meaning in life. To illustrate the theme, he chose an eclectic
number of works dating from the 1960s. You needn’t have shared Kierkegaard’s
religious or intellectual interests to enjoy the show. The works ranged from
Linder’s ‘The Working Class Goes to Paradise’, a trance-like performance in a
Manchester nightclub to Edward Krasinki’s consciously awkward constructions in
wood and wire. Cerith Wyn Evans’ Leaning Horizons, two upright rods leaning against
the wall were neon illuminations embodying geometry, weight and gravity while standing
as cocky intrusions in the room.
Most of the pieces in the show were isolated within
dedicated rooms. This was appropriate for Robert Whitman’s Wavy Red Line, a
laser powered projection of flickering, red lines that traced the proportions
of an 18th century panelled room. The future incongruously met the
past here. Perhaps the work that most addressed the notion of boundaries and
transitions in comprehension was Bruce Nauman’s infamous ‘Clown Torture’ a pair
of video works illustrating psychic confusion whereby a two characters dressed
as clowns neurotically speak plaintive chants, which are later contradicted. He
stages two fictional characters performing statements that might be factual or
imagined, demonstrating the fine line between certainty and doubt and what lies
between them. It’s those ambiguous, narrow spaces in language or materials that
open up new meaning and knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment